10/2/2009 =Child labor= Why it's bad? - opportunity cost lost---lose out on education - sometimes children are forced into it - human capital Reality - it's needs-based: families need the support of working children - short-term gain vs. long-term cost -> subsistence---you'll die if you consider the long-term - gender: females are sometimes not an asset as adults, so put them to work while they are young - the outside option is not always present: in the U.S., we guarantee education up to a certain age, but that's not always the case everywhere How to increase the likelihood of the outside option? - give parents money if they send kids to school - give children food at school - public institution of education -> not perfect if it's funded from local investments, as poor regions will get less resources for education -> government or private institutions may be corrupt Policies against child labor - Boycott the products produced by child labor -> side-effect: if there's nothing else for them to do with their time, the boys may join gangs and the girls may become prostitutes - Western guilt: americans are unhappy with child labor, so _we_ should pay for the policy changes in other countries - Fines: penalize a company with fine of size D, with audit of probability p -> this doesn't help the child street laborer not working for a company - Information campaigns: Rob Jensen did this. Kids who perform badly on tests underestimate value of education on earnings, and vice versa. Just telling kids that increased education->increased earnings leads to higher earnings - Increase motivation: if people are skeptical of govt. or see corruption, they won't see why trying harder to get educated will help Building a model - Wages are based on supply and demand - Demand for workers comes from productivity of workers - Wage of adult: W_a - Wage of kid: W_k - Subsistence level S---minimum level of subsistence you need to survive - D is fine for firm employing children, and p is probability of audit - e = # kids sent to child labor - \alpha*W_a = W_k' W_k = W_k' - pD if W_a > S, e = 0 if W_a < S, e = minimal e required for e*W_k + W_A = S so if the fine D goes up, childhood wages decrease. But then, the minimal e required for e*W_k + W_A = S goes up! only way to beat this is to drive W_k down to 0, which is hard and imperfect Biggest constant in all of development economics: in general, women make better spending decisions (give them the money, let them decide how to spend it, etc.) =Misc. on Nutrition=